Motion approved to investigate activity on portion of Picton Terminals property | InQuinte.ca
×
Today's latest storiesCFB Trenton squadron celebrates 75th anniversary WednesdayMonth-long outbreak over at HJ McFarland HomeArts & Culture grant opportunities available in BellevilleSchedule set for matchup of 'dog' versus 'bear'Flag raised to raise organ donor awarenessMcDougall Insurance announces acquisition of Alberta companyNorthumberland OPP appealing for assistance in B&E investigationUPDATE - investigation concludes into house fire Tuesday morning in BatawaBelleville man arrested following altercation where victim struck in head by glass objectSuperior Court rules Bridge Street encampment in Napanee IllegalBelleville man arrested for breaching court order involving childrenEaster Long Weekend service changes in BellevilleBeyond the Headlines - launch of Artemis 2 mission to moonApplications open for Spring Intake of the Community Initiatives Fund in NapaneeHawks come up one goal short in Game 6Quinte West visiting Good Roads ConferencePotentially heavy rain leads to Flood Outlook Statement for LTC watershedL&A County OPP charge two with impaired drivingMore than $147,600 going to Northumberland communities for emergency preparednessSens sign Stanley
Photo: Yahoo Images

Motion approved to investigate activity on portion of Picton Terminals property

By Brock Ormond Dec 11, 2025 | 4:44 PM

Picton Terminals is under scrutiny for possible illegal quarrying on a piece of its property.

The vast majority of Prince Edward County Council voted to approve a motion to have staff investigate activity on the Sophiasburgh portion of the port’s property on White Chapel Road.

The motion also asked that the provincial Ministry of Natural Resources explain why they believe Picton Terminals is not quarrying in this area.

There had been concerns about reported defiance of a 2018 judgment to cease activity at Picton Terminals.

The activity includes stockpiling aggregate and excavating pits.

Picton Terminals owners had previously noted any stone removed on the Sophiasburgh section was to make room for silos, a storage facility, access and storm water management.

Resident Bill Beckett had made a delegation prior to discussion and approval of the motion to show council photos of pits and heavy equipment associated with possible quarrying.