Motion approved to investigate activity on portion of Picton Terminals property | InQuinte.ca
×
Today's latest storiesBelleville Police make arrest in Internet Child Exploitation investigationOfficer attacked during spousal assault call in BellevilleBelleville man rides bicycle into river before arrestSuspect charged following break-in to business in downtown BellevilleBelleville man charged in connection with attack on a childLocal YMCA and public school board launch Back on Track by the YMCABeyond the Headlines - Iran - US war possibly ending soonBelleville man charged with assaultBelleville man describes time in detention in IsraelTyendinaga Police name new Acting ChiefKenhtè:ke Language and Cultural Centre Now OpenCyclist dies following crash on Saturday night in FoxboroUPDATE- Fire destroys home and former business on Hamilton Road in QWPlanned power outage set for Monday in QWBelleville man part of Global Sumud Flotilla heading homeSteady rain expected in Quinte from Saturday to Sunday morningFraser Park Drive closure to start next week in Quinte WestMonth-long military training being conducted across Quinte starting next TuesdayLocal spring/summer sports season in full swingTrenton man charged in child sexual exploitation case
Photo: Yahoo Images

Motion approved to investigate activity on portion of Picton Terminals property

By Brock Ormond Dec 11, 2025 | 4:44 PM

Picton Terminals is under scrutiny for possible illegal quarrying on a piece of its property.

The vast majority of Prince Edward County Council voted to approve a motion to have staff investigate activity on the Sophiasburgh portion of the port’s property on White Chapel Road.

The motion also asked that the provincial Ministry of Natural Resources explain why they believe Picton Terminals is not quarrying in this area.

There had been concerns about reported defiance of a 2018 judgment to cease activity at Picton Terminals.

The activity includes stockpiling aggregate and excavating pits.

Picton Terminals owners had previously noted any stone removed on the Sophiasburgh section was to make room for silos, a storage facility, access and storm water management.

Resident Bill Beckett had made a delegation prior to discussion and approval of the motion to show council photos of pits and heavy equipment associated with possible quarrying.