Trustee continues legal battle with Hastings and Prince Edward District School Board | InQuinte.ca
×
Today's latest storiesBusing contract will not be thrown out, Ministry requested to step inTrustee continues legal battle with Hastings and Prince Edward District School BoardFull burn ban in effect in PEC on April 1Sens sign prospect goaltenderFlood Outlook Statement extended for Quinte Conservation WatershedCelebrating a century of film in Quinte WestCrawford claims silver with personal bestImpaired charges laid in separate incidentsPedestrian injured in Kingston crashBeyond the Headlines - Avi Lewis chosen as federal NDP leaderSENIOR HOCKEY REPORT: Tweed, Manotick going the distance in Sentinel Cup finalImpaired charges laid following two incidents in Quinte WestSpecial Weather Statement issued with freezing rain likely in Bancroft areaMotion to revisit school bus contracts to be ruled out of orderQuinte Judo athletes put in strong showing at Golden North Judo ChampionshipsKingston youth convicted in relation to 2024 fatal vehicle collisionHuskies claw their way to East Conference FinalHawks ward off elimination again, force Game 6 back in NewmarketSens skunked on Belleville Bulls tribute nightLocal musicians jazz up Glanmore National Historic Site

Trustee continues legal battle with Hastings and Prince Edward District School Board

By Paul Martin Mar 31, 2026 | 5:04 AM

A Trustee with the Hastings and Prince Edward School Board is continuing her legal battle against the Board.

At last night’s meeting, the Board was told that North Prince Edward County Trustee Rachael Prinzen has decided to appeal the recent verdict of the Ontario Divisional Court.

Earlier this month, they dismissed a challenge from Prinzen after she was found to have breached the board’s code of conduct when she shared confidential board documents with the Ministry of Education concerning the board’s operations.

The beleaguered trustee had originally been barred from attending board and committee meetings for 180 days in total, and the court also ruled the 38 days already served would count as the full penalty.

In response to the earlier decision, the Board issued a statement that “As this litigation was initiated by an individual trustee and not the Board, there was a fiduciary responsibility to defend the Board’s integrity and validity of governed processes,”.